COMPARE / GPU.AI VS IO.NET
gpu.ai vs IO.NET
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed daily. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
0 - 6
chips where gpu.ai is cheaper - chips where IO.NET is cheaper, of 6 shared
| GPU model | gpu.ai from | IO.NET from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 4090 | $0.410/hr | $0.250/hr | IO.NET (39% less) |
| RTX A6000 | $0.540/hr | $0.320/hr | IO.NET (41% less) |
| L40 | $0.940/hr | $0.790/hr | IO.NET (16% less) |
| L40S | $0.950/hr | $0.790/hr | IO.NET (17% less) |
| H100 PCIe | $2.380/hr | $0.890/hr | IO.NET (63% less) |
| H100 SXM | $4.790/hr | $1.190/hr | IO.NET (75% less) |
GPU.AI VS IO.NET - FAQ
Is gpu.ai or IO.NET cheaper?
Across the 6 GPU models both providers publish, gpu.ai has the lower rate on 0 and IO.NET on 6. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed daily.
What can I rent at both gpu.ai and IO.NET?
Both publish rates for: RTX 4090, RTX A6000, L40, L40S, H100 PCIe, H100 SXM. gpu.ai lists 24 models total; IO.NET lists 7.
Does Compute Cafe earn from gpu.ai or IO.NET links?
gpu.ai: no affiliate arrangement. IO.NET: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.