COMPARE / COREWEAVE VS GPU.AI
CoreWeave vs gpu.ai
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed hourly. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
0 - 6
chips where CoreWeave is cheaper - chips where gpu.ai is cheaper, of 6 shared
| GPU model | CoreWeave from | gpu.ai from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40 | $1.250/hr | $0.780/hr | gpu.ai (38% less) |
| L40S | $2.250/hr | $0.800/hr | gpu.ai (64% less) |
| RTX PRO 6000 | $2.500/hr | $1.690/hr | gpu.ai (32% less) |
| H100 SXM | $6.155/hr | $3.490/hr | gpu.ai (43% less) |
| H200 SXM | $6.305/hr | $3.990/hr | gpu.ai (37% less) |
| B200 | $8.600/hr | $6.790/hr | gpu.ai (21% less) |
COREWEAVE VS GPU.AI - FAQ
Is CoreWeave or gpu.ai cheaper?
Across the 6 GPU models both providers publish, CoreWeave has the lower rate on 0 and gpu.ai on 6. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed hourly.
What can I rent at both CoreWeave and gpu.ai?
Both publish rates for: L40, L40S, RTX PRO 6000, H100 SXM, H200 SXM, B200. CoreWeave lists 8 models total; gpu.ai lists 18.
Does Compute Cafe earn from CoreWeave or gpu.ai links?
CoreWeave: no affiliate arrangement. gpu.ai: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.