COMPARE / BEAM VS COREWEAVE
Beam vs CoreWeave
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed daily. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
5 - 0
chips where Beam is cheaper - chips where CoreWeave is cheaper, of 5 shared
| GPU model | Beam from | CoreWeave from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40S | $0.760/hr | $2.250/hr | Beam (66% less) |
| RTX PRO 6000 | $1.090/hr | $2.500/hr | Beam (56% less) |
| A100 SXM | $1.360/hr | $2.700/hr | Beam (50% less) |
| H200 SXM | $2.090/hr | $6.305/hr | Beam (67% less) |
| B200 | $4.110/hr | $8.600/hr | Beam (52% less) |
BEAM VS COREWEAVE - FAQ
Is Beam or CoreWeave cheaper?
Across the 5 GPU models both providers publish, Beam has the lower rate on 5 and CoreWeave on 0. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed daily.
What can I rent at both Beam and CoreWeave?
Both publish rates for: L40S, RTX PRO 6000, A100 SXM, H200 SXM, B200. Beam lists 9 models total; CoreWeave lists 8.
Does Compute Cafe earn from Beam or CoreWeave links?
Beam: no affiliate arrangement. CoreWeave: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.