COMPARE / HYDRAHOST VS IO.NET
HydraHost vs IO.NET
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed hourly. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
2 - 3
chips where HydraHost is cheaper - chips where IO.NET is cheaper, of 5 shared
| GPU model | HydraHost from | IO.NET from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 3090 | $0.240/hr | $0.180/hr | IO.NET (25% less) |
| RTX 4090 | $0.400/hr | $0.250/hr | IO.NET (38% less) |
| RTX A6000 | $0.520/hr | $0.320/hr | IO.NET (38% less) |
| L40 | $0.550/hr | $0.790/hr | HydraHost (30% less) |
| L40S | $0.700/hr | $0.790/hr | HydraHost (11% less) |
HYDRAHOST VS IO.NET - FAQ
Is HydraHost or IO.NET cheaper?
Across the 5 GPU models both providers publish, HydraHost has the lower rate on 2 and IO.NET on 3. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed hourly.
What can I rent at both HydraHost and IO.NET?
Both publish rates for: RTX 3090, RTX 4090, RTX A6000, L40, L40S. HydraHost lists 9 models total; IO.NET lists 9.
Does Compute Cafe earn from HydraHost or IO.NET links?
HydraHost: no affiliate arrangement. IO.NET: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.