COMPARE / COREWEAVE VS VULTR
CoreWeave vs Vultr
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed daily. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
0 - 5
chips where CoreWeave is cheaper - chips where Vultr is cheaper, of 5 shared
| GPU model | CoreWeave from | Vultr from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| L40S | $2.250/hr | $0.848/hr | Vultr (62% less) |
| A100 SXM | $2.700/hr | $1.490/hr | Vultr (45% less) |
| H100 SXM | $6.155/hr | $2.300/hr | Vultr (63% less) |
| GH200 | $6.500/hr | $1.990/hr | Vultr (69% less) |
| B200 | $8.600/hr | $3.500/hr | Vultr (59% less) |
COREWEAVE VS VULTR - FAQ
Is CoreWeave or Vultr cheaper?
Across the 5 GPU models both providers publish, CoreWeave has the lower rate on 0 and Vultr on 5. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed daily.
What can I rent at both CoreWeave and Vultr?
Both publish rates for: L40S, A100 SXM, H100 SXM, GH200, B200. CoreWeave lists 8 models total; Vultr lists 11.
Does Compute Cafe earn from CoreWeave or Vultr links?
CoreWeave: no affiliate arrangement. Vultr: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.