COMPARE / AWS VS INHOSTED
AWS vs InHosted
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed hourly. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
0 - 6
chips where AWS is cheaper - chips where InHosted is cheaper, of 6 shared
| GPU model | AWS from | InHosted from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| L4 | $0.805/hr | $0.511/hr | InHosted (36% less) |
| L40S | $1.861/hr | $0.866/hr | InHosted (53% less) |
| A100 40GB | $2.745/hr | $1.773/hr | InHosted (35% less) |
| A100 80GB | $3.431/hr | $2.357/hr | InHosted (31% less) |
| H100 SXM | $6.880/hr | $2.601/hr | InHosted (62% less) |
| H200 SXM | $7.912/hr | $3.130/hr | InHosted (60% less) |
AWS VS INHOSTED - FAQ
Is AWS or InHosted cheaper?
Across the 6 GPU models both providers publish, AWS has the lower rate on 0 and InHosted on 6. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed hourly.
What can I rent at both AWS and InHosted?
Both publish rates for: L4, L40S, A100 40GB, A100 80GB, H100 SXM, H200 SXM. AWS lists 14 models total; InHosted lists 13.
Does Compute Cafe earn from AWS or InHosted links?
AWS: no affiliate arrangement. InHosted: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.