COMPARE / IO.NET VS QUICKPOD
IO.NET vs QuickPod
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed hourly. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
2 - 2
chips where IO.NET is cheaper - chips where QuickPod is cheaper, of 5 shared
| GPU model | IO.NET from | QuickPod from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| RTX 3090 | $0.180/hr | $0.180/hr | tie |
| RTX 4080 | $0.200/hr | $0.130/hr | QuickPod (35% less) |
| RTX 4090 | $0.250/hr | $0.100/hr | QuickPod (60% less) |
| RTX A6000 | $0.320/hr | $0.350/hr | IO.NET (9% less) |
| H100 SXM | $1.190/hr | $2.500/hr | IO.NET (52% less) |
IO.NET VS QUICKPOD - FAQ
Is IO.NET or QuickPod cheaper?
Across the 5 GPU models both providers publish, IO.NET has the lower rate on 2 and QuickPod on 2. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed hourly.
What can I rent at both IO.NET and QuickPod?
Both publish rates for: RTX 3090, RTX 4080, RTX 4090, RTX A6000, H100 SXM. IO.NET lists 9 models total; QuickPod lists 42.
Does Compute Cafe earn from IO.NET or QuickPod links?
IO.NET: no affiliate arrangement. QuickPod: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.