COMPARE / AWS VS JARVISLABS
AWS vs JarvisLabs
Like-for-like on-demand GPU pricing from each provider's own published rates, refreshed daily. No reserved or committed-use pricing on either side.
HEAD TO HEAD
0 - 5
chips where AWS is cheaper - chips where JarvisLabs is cheaper, of 5 shared
| GPU model | AWS from | JarvisLabs from | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| L4 | $0.805/hr | $0.440/hr | JarvisLabs (45% less) |
| A100 40GB | $2.745/hr | $0.890/hr | JarvisLabs (68% less) |
| A100 80GB | $3.431/hr | $1.490/hr | JarvisLabs (57% less) |
| H100 SXM | $6.880/hr | $3.490/hr | JarvisLabs (49% less) |
| H200 SXM | $7.912/hr | $4.590/hr | JarvisLabs (42% less) |
AWS VS JARVISLABS - FAQ
Is AWS or JarvisLabs cheaper?
Across the 5 GPU models both providers publish, AWS has the lower rate on 0 and JarvisLabs on 5. It varies chip by chip - the table above compares like-for-like per-GPU hourly rates from each provider's own published prices, refreshed daily.
What can I rent at both AWS and JarvisLabs?
Both publish rates for: L4, A100 40GB, A100 80GB, H100 SXM, H200 SXM. AWS lists 14 models total; JarvisLabs lists 5.
Does Compute Cafe earn from AWS or JarvisLabs links?
AWS: no affiliate arrangement. JarvisLabs: no affiliate arrangement. Referral status never changes the numbers or the order on this page.